Categories
Case Studies and Articles

Checklists for Older Clients – Vaughn W. Henry

Checklists for Older Clients – Vaughn W. Henry

Estate Planning Isn’t Just for the Elderly

 

You don’t need to be rich and famous to need an estate or financial plan.  While some people have the expertise and time to manage their affairs, others are more comfortable with the advice and counsel of professional consultants.  In either case, decisions need to be made ahead of time so you’re not stampeded into making bad choices when things start to go wrong.  First off, decide how comfortable you are with your current financial situation.  Then decide whether you need professional assistance to sort through your options.  One of the earliest questions you need to address is what happens if you are unable to manage your affairs competently down the road.  Besides accidents and acute emergencies, there are chronic and progressive illnesses that prevent people from being able to enforce their wishes and keep on top of their finances.  In either case, do you have a trusted family member, friend, or a professional advisor who can handle your money if you become incapacitated or ill?  Have you made any decisions, and shared them with family members, about the level of care and extraordinary treatments needed should you become seriously ill? 

 

It’s Not Always about Money

 

 

imageOften, arranging your affairs is more about preserving dignity and control.  Sometimes estate planning is a function of life planning; doing simple things like modifying your residence to accommodate your physical restrictions will make things easier.  For example, many people choose to widen doorways, lower light switches, install rails and bars in bathrooms, or to build ramps or lifts for stairs in order to make the home more comfortable.  Occasionally there are other emotional concerns about losing independence.  Distasteful as it may be, address them now, rather than later.  For example, do you still feel safe driving, even at night?  The problem is that many older drivers deny they have a problem or are so cognitively impaired they fail to recognize the cues that signal problems, e.g., forgetting to turn on headlights at dusk, getting lost in familiar neighborhoods, failing to recognize mechanical problems like low tire pressure, responding too slowly to emergencies, and so on.  Family members and advisors need to step in and offer to help structure or organize things so you can minimize danger to self and others.

 

Other difficult questions the elderly often avoid include quality of life issues.  Is there adequate health and long-term care insurance?  Is hospice or home care an option with your coverage?  Some of this preparation involves discussions with medical providers about some very personal values.  For instance, when you’re very sick, how much information do you want your physician to relate to you and your family about diagnoses, treatments, and recovery outcomes?  How involved do you want to be in decision making for your health care?  Will you authorize and insist on pain medication if circumstances dictate its need, even if it’s not part of your medical treatment?  Values planning issues involve medical, personal, emotional, and spiritual matters, so you need to discuss this with your family and physician if you expect procedures to be done according to your wishes.  Not only will you want to stipulate how you want to be treated, part of a good estate plan allows you to tell family important things they should know.  Itemize your thoughts in an “ethical will” where you not only tell heirs what you want them to receive, but why you want them to receive it and how your life developed over time.  It’s a great opportunity to leave your family a little something about yourself.

 

Have you made a list of all the important information that would be useful in case of family health emergencies?  Have you discussed your funeral arrangements?  A little preparation will save a lot of grief and expense; so make your choices now and regain control of your life planning.  There is no time like the present to get started; you’ve put it off too long.



Information Checklist

  1. Birth certificates, marriage certificates, passports and other important identification documents, any court documents dealing with a name change or adoption proceedings
  2. Marriage contracts (pre-nuptial and post-nuptial, divorce or separation agreements)
  3. Life insurance policies (have you checked to see if beneficiary designations current and accurate?)
  4. Identify other insurance policies (disability, affinity programs, health, property & casualty, and annuity contracts), insurance agent contact information
  5. Stock and bond holdings, consolidated investment account statements, broker contact information
  6. Powers of attorney for health care and property, living will or advance directive documents, while not helpful after death, they are extremely important if there is a disability or incompetence.
  7. Your will and codicils (have you identified guardians for minors and elderly parents?).  A list of personal items and the intended recipients, as it is often the family heirlooms that cause family rifts.  If any mementos are given away early, mark them off the list so they will not be reported missing or stolen.
  8. Trust documents and amendments (properly titled property in the name of the trust)
  9. Trustee, and successor trustee contact information if any, and contact information for your lawyer
  10. Mortgage documents, due date and amount of mortgage payment or rent, location of deeds and property titles, including cemetery plots, any lease information
  11. Contact information for service people.  Identifyautomatic debits or deposits and which accounts are involved (electric utilities, gas, pension payments, etc.), automatic deliveries or pick ups that need to be modified (trash, fuel oil or propane, mail, newspaper)
  12. Bank account information, checkbooks, passbook savings, account statements and PIN numbers, contact information for bankers or brokers, inventory of contents and location of safety deposit box and the key, credit card and ATM account numbers and their expiration dates; if there is a safe, who will have the combination
  13. Airline mileage points and phone numbers, life insurance provided by affinity groups, travel or credit card companies
  14. Partnership agreements, recent appraisals, corporate or partnership buy-sell arrangements, business continuity planning documents
  15. Pension, profit-sharing, IRA and other retirement plans (are beneficiary designations current now that new rules apply to changing required distributions), retirement plan administrator contact information.  If there’s a desire to support a charity with a bequest, these retirement plans make great, tax efficient ways to fund philanthropic interests with simple beneficiary designations.
  16. Contact information for your medical providers, current medications and dosages, Medicare claim number and Medigap policy number
  17. Employment contracts, deferred compensation or “golden parachutes/handcuffs” type agreements
  18. Any life income arrangements (commercial immediate annuities, charitable trusts, life estates)
  19. Social Security card
  20. Veteran’s benefits updated and military discharge paperwork, e.g., DD-214
  21. Organ donation instructions, funeral arrangements and burial instructions
  22. Directions for pet care
  23. Recent income and gift tax returns, contact information for your accountant, current 1099’s and W-2’s, expense and income worksheets for this tax year
  24. Inventory of capital assets (real estate, stock, investments, collectibles, etc.) with purchase price, history of acquisition, improvements and tax basis (which will be extremely important if the tax laws continue unchanged)
  25. Driver’s license number and expiration date, vehicle registration information, inventory of any items in storage and storage company phone number
  26. Text Box: © 2002, 2005 -- Vaughn W. Henry Gift and Estate Planning Services Springfield, IL 62703-5314 217.529.1958 -- 217.529.1959 fax VWHenry@aol.com www.gift-estate.comAny post office rental box, contact information for neighbors and friends, a list of names and phone numbers of those who should be notified during a serious illness or death
  27. Web site or e-mail accounts and passwords
  28. It is not too early to write an obituary while the person can contribute to it
Categories
Case Studies and Articles

How donors should take charge of their priorities

How donors should take charge of their priorities

Getting Your Advisors on Board – Why You Need Marching Orders for the Donor’s Advisors

Good stewardship starts with a clear plan and explicit directions

Despite the self-promoting press releases foundations and corporations generate with their giving programs, in most cases, the individual donor makes the real difference for a charity’s bottom line. According to Giving USA’s 2001 edition, 83.5% of charitable giving is from lifetime gifts and bequests from individuals.

As the population ages, more and more donors are looking for creative ways to arrange charitable gifts, and that brings us to planned giving. Why is that?  Planned gifts generally are made from capital assets, and not income.  Donors including philanthropy in their plans may use stock, land, or business interests very creatively instead of hard to find cash.  Besides helping out a deserving charity, there are tax benefits; the option for added income, and, best of all, donors need not be high-income wage earners to be tax efficient philanthropists.

Bequests and charitable trusts provide the bulk of new endowment funds; and exceptionally generous and motivated supporters make significant contributions possible.  However, no donor lives in a vacuum.  Most have a cadre of one or more professional advisors who provide them with tax, legal and financial advice.

Wise donors give because they are excited about a charity’s capacity to make the world a better place.  However, many early discussions about a proposed gift start with the charity’s fundraising staff rather than the donor’s trusted advisor.  Subsequent meetings with professional advisors, brought in later in the process, may steer the gift discussion off course.  Why does this happen?  Sometimes disinterested or inept advisors lack the technical background to understand the gift planning process, other times it revolves around miscommunication.  For all the good that a well-trained advisor can do for a donor, most of those who fail to follow through with a client’s charitable wishes do so because the client does not clearly and forcefully express his or her desires.  As a result, donors miss opportunities to support charities and projects that have drawn their attention or tugged at their heart.  And, it’s not just the charity that loses out; it is also the donor. Wonderfully creative gift arrangements can provide a sense of accomplishment and meet many of the donor’s goals too.

Commercial advisors often view their roles as one of protection and oversight, and too often do not understand or share their client’s interest in supporting a worthy nonprofit organization.  While various polls have reported that between 66 percent and 80 percent of all planned gifts are motivated by the professional advisors, unfortunately there are too many advisors responsible for derailing an untold number of needed and otherwise thoughtful gifts.

Last Updated: March 6, 2003

Gift & Estate Planning Services © 2003

Google

PhilanthroCalc for the WebCONTACT US FOR A FREE PRELIMINARY CASE STUDY FOR YOUR OWN CRT SCENARIO or try your own at Donor Direct. Please note — there’s more to estate and charitable planning than simply running calculations, but it does give you a chance to see how the calculations affect some of the design considerations. Which tools work best in which planning scenarios? Check with our office for solutions.

Categories
Case Studies and Articles

IASB November Cracker Barrel Forum

imageimageimageimage

Overcome Financial Fears
image image image image image image image image image image
Financial goals must not be jeopardized
by charitable strategies
Acknowledge and address concerns
about the donor’s financial security and
any potential turmoil from concerned
heirs before pursuing gifting programs
The majority of donors would give more
if they were in a position to do so
Show them how to afford more gifting
Categories
New Articles

Why It Makes Sense to Let a Charity “Use” Your Money

Why It Makes Sense to Let a Charity “Use” Your Money

Why It Makes Sense to Let a Charity “Use” Your Money

The Grantor Charitable Lead Annuity Trust

image

Bruce Leahy and his wife LeeAnn have had a long relationship with a local private elementary school and serve on the board of directors for two other charitable organizations.  As year-end approaches, Bruce finds that he is due to receive a significant bonus from his employer, a pharmaceutical manufacturer, for a patent and some cutting-edge research that Bruce guided through the regulatory process.  While he and his wife are comfortable now, they cannot afford to give up the bonus with an outright gift to charity.  However, they feel that they can do without the money for the next eight years.  Rather than give the entire bonus, they have opted to use a grantor lead trust and provide annual support to charity while they are working.  The CLAT generates an immediate income tax deduction of $342,270 even though the future payments to charity take place over eight years.  This deduction will help offset some of their increased income tax liability, and that makes it a little more helpful since Bruce’s bonus will push them into the top marginal bracket this year.  In effect, this plan allows the Leahys to loan the money’s use to support their philanthropic interests as long as they reacquire their “seed money” before retirement. 

 

 

Year

Beginning

Principal

5.00%

Growth

Annual

Payment

 

Remainder

    1

$1,000,000

$50,000

$50,000

$1,000,000

    2

$1,000,000

$50,000

$50,000

$1,000,000

    3

$1,000,000

$50,000

$50,000

$1,000,000

    4

$1,000,000

$50,000

$50,000

$1,000,000

    5

$1,000,000

$50,000

$50,000

$1,000,000

    6

$1,000,000

$50,000

$50,000

$1,000,000

    7

$1,000,000

$50,000

$50,000

$1,000,000

    8

$1,000,000

$50,000

$50,000

$1,000,000

Totals:

$1,000,000

$400,000

$400,000

$1,000,000

As it turns out, the current and extraordinarily low §7520 rate of 3.6% makes their gift planning an especially attractive option.  When the applicable federal rate (AFR) is this low, the lead annuity trust, private annuities, grantor retained annuity trusts and charitable gifts of the remainder interest in a farm or personal residence are most tax efficient.  For donors who regularly make annual charitable contributions and may not always itemize or qualify for a Schedule deduction, the use of a lead trust now gives them an effective way to deduct their philanthropic support and do it up front. 

 

By making annual contributions of $50,000 to their donor advised fund, the Leahys could create an account that functions like a quasi-private foundation with the infrastructure and oversight of a 501(c)3 public charity.  This strategy allows Bruce and LeeAnn to pre-fund their DAF while they are in a position to use their combined salaries to maintain lifestyle and still make judicious future distributions over many years.  With most community foundations, the families have the ability to continue making recommendations for grants over several generations, and involve heirs with charity.

 

For people trying to reduce gift or estate taxes, there is a related lead trust that gives up the income tax deduction in favor of an estate and gift tax deduction.  This non-grantor trust, paying income to charity with the remainder distributed to heirs, also makes sense during this period of historically low discount rates.  For individuals who do not need the principal back, the use of a non-grantor lead trust would generate a gift tax deduction for the same amount mentioned above; therefore, the donor is able to reduce the taxable transfer to the heirs from $1,000,000 to only $657,730.  If there is growth inside this trust, then this growth passes tax-free to heirs too.  Professional advisors should note that it is critically important to manage investments carefully inside a non-grantor CLAT, as it is a complex, tax-paying trust, unlike the more common charitable remainder trust.  However, with the Leahys grantor trust, where trust principal eventually reverts to the donor, tax on any income earned is at the donor’s marginal tax rate  Therefore, the Leahys’ lead trust will invest in a combination of tax-free municipal bonds and a few non-dividend paying growth stocks to keep the trust from spinning off unwanted taxable income.  Unlike the grantor trust that receives its entire tax deduction up front, the non-grantor trust receives charitable income tax deductions offsetting income otherwise taxed at compressed trust rates via annual charitable distributions.  A good financial and estate plan creates a cohesive strategy that will have an ongoing impact on philanthropic activities important to the Leahy family.

 

Text Box: © 2002 -- Vaughn W. Henry Gift and Estate Planning Services Springfield, IL 62703-5314 217.529.1958 -- 217.529.1959 fax VWHenry@aol.com www.gift-estate.com

 

Categories
Case Studies and Articles

Freeze and Squeeze

Freeze and Squeeze

Why planning works to preserve family businesses

 

Despite all the press coverage about the death tax, in reality, few people worry about confiscatory estate taxes.  However, those owning family businesses and farms seem to provide a disproportionate share of federal and state revenues at death.  Although there is some temporary federal relief offered if you accept the moving goal post formula for estate taxes, the operative word is “temporary”.  A significant and new problem for many is the increasing percentage of estates subject to higher income taxes and the recently enacted estate and inheritance taxes imposed by revenue-starved states. 

 

The solution?

Consider making charitable gifts of those assets that trigger both income and estate tax at death (income in respect of a decedent or IRD), and keep the estate from ballooning in value.   With a little prior planning, there is no need to pay unnecessary taxes if owners freeze the value of their growing business and transfer it before tax liabilities mount up.  How does that work?  Easily, but few taxpayers take advantage of their right to make tax-free gifts to heirs on a regular basis.  It is a shame, because over time, significant value can be compressed and given via lifetime and annual exclusion gifts, especially if husband and wife join to make full use of gifts to children, in-laws, and grandchildren.  For many families with four married children, and grandchildren, it is common for half a million dollars in estate value to be transferred free of tax.  By making those gifts repeatedly over the years, most estates would see significant tax savings.  Yet few families take advantage of this right. Why?  Most family business owners resist making gifts fearing loss of control, and are unwilling to take a proactive long-range view of the planning process.

 

Plan now, notlater

Sam Walton, founder of the Wal-Mart empire, is a great example of successful transition tax planning.  He passed the bulk of his business interests to his heirs with little tax erosion by preparing the plan early in his career.  Sam and Helen started their retail business after World War II with $5,000 in savings and $20,000 borrowed from Helen’s father; then built that stake into a multi-billion dollar marketing behemoth.  Along the way, they learned lessons in business succession planning and resolved to create a family owned business, Walton Enterprises, in which they transferred 20% of their business interests to each of their four children (Rob, John, Jim, and Alice) and kept their remaining 20% portion as separate shares.  When Sam passed away in 1992, owning only his 10% ownership interest in the $26 billion Walton business, the taxable value of his estate was much smaller because of his prior gifts.  Although specific details are not available for the entire Walton zero estate tax plan, Sam’s 10% ownership of Walton Enterprises passed tax-free through a marital trust for his wife.  As reported by Forbes magazine’s best estimates of family wealth in the annual “Forbes 400” (September 2002), his planning meant that each of the five principal Walton heirs is now worth $18.8 billion.  When Mrs. Walton passes on, her interests divide when the non-voting shares flow to the Walton charities, while the voting shares transfer to their younger heirs who will continue to control the retail, banking and real estate business.  

 

The planning concept is simple.  The best way to reduce or eliminate estate taxes is to freeze the value and give it away before assets appreciate, so worth grows in the heirs’ hands.  This transfers the tax value.  Maintaining control is a different issue; keep the managing interest separate and retain command of the family business.  The advantage of passing non-voting ownership interests to heirs is that discounting and compression may result in a lower tax value when heirs do not have significant management influence.  Typically, the IRS allows independent appraisers to lessen the taxable value of a business if there are minority interests, limited marketability, and lack of control.  That is the “squeeze” in the planning, and it means that it becomes easier to pass a business at a discount.  This is not “do it yourself brain surgery”; proper planning and legal procedures must be used, so seek competent counsel and do it right.

 

Had that unplanned growth and value stayed in Sam and Helen Walton’s hands, and been subject to tax under current rates, the tax bill would exceed $47 billion today.  It would be hard to imagine any family business being unaffected by a need for that kind of liquidity in just nine months after the death of a principal owner.

 

What Sam Walton achieved through effective planning –

  • Reduced his gift and estate taxes
  • Improved his planning options
  • Protected some of his assets from creditors
  • Transferred assets to heirs without losing control
  • Kept his children tied to the family business by shifting an equity interest to heirs
  • Achieved flexibility of structure and design through the partnership
  • Avoided probate by using methods that operate by contract
  • Ensured privacy for his dealings
  • Leveraged use of his tax-free transfers, like the annual exclusion gifts that are now $11,000 and the new $1,000,000 applicable exclusion or $1,100,000 generation skipping exemptions.
Categories
Case Studies and Articles

Statistical Information on Injuries in the Horse Business – Summary by Emmy R. Miller, PhD, RN

Statistical Information on Injuries in the Horse Business – Summary by Emmy R. Miller, PhD, RN

am a nurse working in head injury research.  Someone mentioned that they didn’t know the statistics for

equestrian related head injuries.  Well, have a few sources here and will provide some of them for you.

Sports Medicine 9(1):36-47, 1009

Synopsis:  The most common location of horse-related injuries is:

         upper extremity 24-61% (reported in different studies)

         lower extremity 36-40%

         head and face 20%

The most common type of injury is:

         soft tissue injury 92%

         fractures 57%

         concussion 15%

The most frequent consequence of injury is:

         hospitalization 5%

         residual impairment 2% (i.e. seizures, paralysis, cognitive impairments, etc)

         death 1%

JAMA, April 10, 1996, vol 275, no 14, p. 1072

Synopsis:   During 1992-93 in Oklahoma, horseback riding was the leading cause of sports-related head injury, (109 of 9409 injuries or 1.2% associated with riding and 23 additional injuries attributable to horses)  Of the 109, there were 3 deaths (3%).  The injury statistics were:

         males 55, female 54

         age range 3 yr to 71 yrs, median 30 yrs

         most commonly seen in spring and summer

         48% occurred on Saturday or Sunday

         95% involved riders who struck their heads on the ground or a nearby object after falling from the horse

         4% were kicked or rolled on after falling from the horse

         1% hit head on a pole while riding and fell to the ground

         90% were associated with recreational activities

         10% were work-related

         107 were hospitalized with a median LOS of 2 days

         79% had one or more indicators of a severe brain injury, including

1.        loss of consciousness 63%

2.        posttraumatic amnesia 46%

3.        persistent neurologicsequelae 13% (seizures, cognitive/vision/speech deficits, motor impairment)

Among the 23 injuries not riding related, 21 (91%) resulted from a direct kick to the head by the horse, where died immediately and 2 required CPR.  13 of these injuries occurred in children less that 13 yrs old.

Journal of Trauma 1997 July; 43(1):97-99

Synopsis:   Thirty million Americans ride horses and 50,000 are treated in Emergency Departments annually. Neurologic injuries constitute the majority of severe injuries and fatalities.  A prospective study of all patients admitted to the University of Kentucky Medical Center with equine-related trauma

from July 1992 – January 1996 showed the following:

         18 of 30 (60%) patients were male

         11 (37%) were professional riders

         24 (80%) were head injuries and 9 (30%) were spinal injuries (4 with both)

         age ranged from 3 to 64 yrs

         patients died (17%)

         2 suffered permanent paralysis (7)

         60% were caused by “ejection or fall from horse”

         40% were kicked by the horse, with 4 of these sustaining crush injuries

         6 patients (20%) required craniotomy (i.e. brain surgery)

         24 patients (80%) were not wearing helmets, including all fatalities and craniotomy patients

“Experience is not protective; helmets are.”

This last line is a direct quote from this article.  hope you find these statistics helpful.

Back to Horse Farm Management

Categories
Case Studies and Articles

Are there good assets and bad assets in your estate? – Henry & Associates

Are You Trapped with Retirement Plan Assets?

 

image“Give my stuff to charity!  What kind of crazy estate plan is that?”  That’s a typical response when clients ask about ways to eliminate unnecessary estate taxes and are told to make gifts.  It’s an understandable reaction.  It’s also not intuitively obvious how giving away something the client needs can be a good thing, especially if the potential donor was raised during the Depression.  The epiphany comes when clients look at the choices they have for assets not consumed to support their lifestyle; those remaining assets can only go to children, charity or Congress.  Once the options are explored, many people make an informed decision to pass property to heirs and other assets to charities that either had or will have some impact on their family’s life.  How can they be smarter making that decision?

 

Good assets and bad assets.

Actually, most people don’t see much difference between the two, as any inherited asset ought to be a good asset, right?  Well, some inherited assets come with an accompanying income tax bill, even in estates too small for an estate tax.  Who’s at risk?  Many professionals and retirees have worked a lifetime and have accumulated a significant 401(k), 403(b) or an IRA and don’t realize that their heirs will not receive the full value of that account.

 

Option #1.  As it turns out, giving heirs all the assets that can be legally excluded from tax and leaving the rest of the estate to charity works if (and it’s a big if) tax avoidance and philanthropy are the only goals.  It’s a simple, easy to understand process with no need for expensive tax planning or specialized legal advice.  While this technique might shortchange family heirs, it is an ideal solution for charitably motivated families.  However, even if the family has an altruistic desire to make a charitable gift, there’s no reason it can’t be done in a tax efficient manner.  How so?  Make those charitable bequests with assets that otherwise would be taxed twice.  For example, in 2002 and 2003 anything in excess of $1,000,000 is subject to a federal estate tax.  A simple estate plan would sweep anything above that level to charity.  A better plan would be to give away those assets on which an added income tax is owed.  What qualifies?  Use those “income in respect of a decedent” (IRD) assets.  Start with an IRA, a retirement plan account, a deferred annuity, savings bonds and don’t forget earned, but uncollected professional fees; these are all unattractive and taxable assets for your heirs.  Instead, a bequest made from that donated IRA means a charity receiving $100,000 collects the whole value without paying any tax.  In the traditional estate plan, children might be penalized 75 or 80 percent if they inherited those IRD and tax-deferred dollars.  Better to let family heirs inherit assets that “step up” in basis, so if they’re sold later, there won’t be much of an income tax due.  This proactive approach is more tax efficient, as the charity receives more, the heirs get to keep more and the IRS gets zilch.

 

Option #2.  With the latest rules on required minimum distributions, many financial planners propose “stretch IRA” programs and make a good case for their use.  Unfortunately, for all the planning that goes into them, few heirs leave the plans alone long enough for the stretch to do any good.  For owners of significant retirement plans, naming a charitable remainder trust as beneficiary might make better financial sense.  While there’s usually no charitable income tax deduction, there’s often a significant estate tax deduction and this charitable roll-over still ensures a steady income stream for a surviving spouse that’s not going to be subject to required distributions that erode the value of the asset.  For older heirs, a CRT funded with IRD assets might be an ideal solution to eventually convert an ordinary income pump to an income stream taxed at capital gains rates.

 

The problem is that without changes in beneficiary designations or specific language in the Will, the estate can’t make charitable gifts of income.  Bequests are normally made from principal unless there has been a proactive decision to give away tax liabilities.  Seek guidance from competent professional advisors to make sure these gifts are properly implemented, and do it now.

 

 

A good plan deals with concerns beyond tax efficiency; it must also meet the needs of the family.  For instance, will the plan provide for proper management by underage or unprepared heirs?  Has it been decided if there’s an upper limit on what heirs could or should receive?  What does the concept of money mean to the client?  How much is too much?  Could an inheritance provide a disincentive to work and succeed?  Does the plan try to pass assets to all heirs equally, or have past gifts and interactions been considered in an effort to be equitable?  Since there’s more to a legacy than just money, the estate plan should include passing down a family’s value system and influence.  How have the family’s core values been addressed in the master plan? 

 

The problem is that few professional advisors like to deal with such intimate and personal questions.  Most tax and estate planners spend years honing their analytical skills only to find that clients don’t create and implement estate plans for purely logical reasons.  Instead, there’s an overriding emotional motivation that’s often unsolicited in discussions with client.  The problem is that even an elegant estate plan that does everything it’s supposed to accomplish won’t be well received if the family doesn’t understand and agree with its goals.  As a result, there’s paralysis by analysis, and nothing gets accomplished until both the logical and emotional needs for family continuity planning occur.  Rather than try to plan an estate on an asset-by-asset basis, take a big picture view of the family’s goals and values and see how the planning can be made to meet those needs.

 

Subscribe to Henry & Associate

 

Gift and Estate Planning Discussions

Want to be kept up to date

 

on CRT planning issues?

Join our mailing list!

   
Check our Trust and Planning Archive Hosted by Henry & Associates
sectionbreak

Subscribe to Henry & Associate

 

Gift and Estate Planning Discussions

Want to be kept up to date

 

on CRT planning issues?

Join our mailing list!

  Check our Trust and Planning ArchiveHosted by Henry & Associates
Subscribe to Henry & Associate

 

Gift and Estate Planning Discussions

Want to be kept up to date

 

on CRT planning issues?

Join our mailing list!

  
Check our Trust and Planning ArchiveHosted by Henry & Associates

 

image

 

Categories
Case Studies and Articles

Things You Really Need to Know About Planned Gifts – Henry & Associates

Things You Really Need to Know About Planned Gifts – Henry & Associates

Things You Need to Know

Creating a planned gift is a great and noble act.  However, as more charities, commercial advisors, and prospective donors jump onto the planned giving wagon,imagethere are going to be dissatisfied clients and unhappy charities.  Why is that?  Simply said, too few advisors and planned giving officers do a good job disclosing all of the restrictions and the potential downside of these irrevocable gifts.  Then add in all of the client-donors who do their research on the web and think they can go down to the local super-store and get a ready to use trust off the shelf, there is bound to be disappointment.  One of the biggest problems with charitable remainder trusts is that invalid assumptions abound.

  1. A Charitable Remainder Trust (§664 CRUT or CRAT) is a charitable giving vehicle, not a tax avoidance scam  While there are tax advantages, it still requires that the trustmaker have some charitable intent.
  2. Generally, a CRT is transactionally driven.  Donors create them to minimize an immediate capital gains tax liability and keep more value at work.  Since some assets are unsuitable inside a CRT, double-check early in the research process with advisors on how to best fund the CRT.
  3. Treat the income tax deduction like icing on the cake.  Because it is a deduction, and not a credit, it offsets the adjusted gross income (AGI) on the taxpayer’s annual return.  The problem is that the deduction is only a present value of the future gift and if the remainder charity is a public 501(c)3, it is limited to 50% of the donor’s AGI for cash contributions and 30% for contributions of selected appreciated assets.  Other contributions either will not generate a tax deduction or may be limited to tax basis, so knowing what works and what does not is an important skill competent advisors bring to the planning table.
  4. The income tax deduction may be wasted unless the donor makes significant income, even over the six tax years it is available, as it may not be completely used up.  For example, a 75 year-old donor of appreciated farmland valued at $600,000, lives poor but may die “rich”.  Although “rich”, this donor has never made more than $45,000 in a year and is going to be hard- pressed to use the $360,000 deduction a 5% CRUT produces.
  5. Trustmakerswho act as trustees have to wear two hats.  They must prudently manage the trust assets for the benefit of the charitable remainder as well as to produce tax efficient income.  This is one reason charities acting as trustee may leave themselves open to hard feelings, dissatisfied donors and possible liability issues that show up years in the future if the trust does not perform as predicted.
  6. An annuity trust can run out of money and implode.  A CRT stands on its own merits, so investment performance can make or break a charitable trust.  If it falls apart, the charity is not going to make up the shortfall.
  7. A CRT created to pay lifetime income for one or two beneficiaries bases its projections on IRS actuarial tables.  Life expectancies are a median number, so 50% of people will live longer than expected and planners need to factor in the possibility that the trust will last long enough for a beneficiary who reaches age 100 to continue receiving an income stream.
  8. Donors who try to create a CRT with less than $150,000 of assets may have the equivalent of a jet engine on a jeep.  They have selected a vehicle that usually requires document drafting, appraisals, and ongoing administration expense; there is a minimum threshold for a CRT to stand on its own.
  9. A CRT can be set up to benefit more than one charity.  Properly drafted trusts will allow for changes or additions to the list of charitable beneficiaries.  A CRT can even allow for current distributions directly to a charity if the donor builds in that flexibility.
  10. If a CRT trustmaker has more than one income beneficiary (other than himself/herself), there may be an estate or gift tax liability for that gift of an income interest.  If there are more than two income beneficiaries or if there is a large spread in ages, there is a likelihood that the CRT will not pass the 10% remainder test
  11. Managing investments inside a CRT, or a CLT for that matter, is not the same as managing a 401(k) or IRA.  Retirement accounts always produce ordinary income; a well-managed CRT should do better than that.

 

Categories
article

Malpractice Issues #7 in CRT Planning – Vaughn W. Henry

Sometimes it’s interesting to sit in the back of the room during a seminar on advanced estate planning and listen to concepts. It’s a great way to learn and observe presentation skills in order to make my own workshops easier to understand.  Unfortunately, some folks doing these seminars have only a loose grasp on the nuances of how charitable trusts really function; as a result, often learn what not to do.

 

In one memorable session, a stockbroker was pitching the CRT as a “capital gains by-pass trust” and told his audience that when clients contribute appreciated assets to a CRT they can completely avoid tax.  Then he suggested that the best replacement asset would be a bundle of tax-free municipal bonds.  His thinking was that by using a tax-free bond it would generate only tax-free income for the income beneficiary. 

 

The broker believed income from the CRT was tax-free “because, after all, it bypasses capital gains.”  In reality, the CRT only defers capital gains since annual payments are still taxed to the income beneficiary under the 4-tier fiduciary accounting system.  Using the broker’s proposed scenario of swapping $1 million of appreciated assets for tax-free income, the eventual payout on a 5% CRAT funded with appreciated stock or land with $100,000 of basis would result in eighteen years of payments taxed at 20%. Why? The unrealized capital gains have to be distributed and taxed before any tax-free income can be distributed.  The problem with investing in a tax-free bond portfolio is that the potential for growth is severely compromised in order to obtain the illusory goal of tax-free income.  In other words, it’s just plain dumb.  Plus, the IRS disqualifies any CRT where the trustee is obligated to use a tax-free bond or where any restrictive investment policies exist[Reg.1.664-1(a)(3)]

 

How do these misconceptions get a foothold?  Many professional advisors, despite all their talk about vast CRT experience, have never actually worked around a §664 CRT.  While most advisors have experience with the thousands of pension plans and millions of clients setting aside money in retirement plans, few have seen, much less understand, a split-interest CRT. 

 

As it turns out, the most reliable measure of client satisfaction with charitable planning is related to their advisors’ experience and level of sophistication.* 

 

image

 

image

 

 

The latest IRS data* on charitable remainder trusts lists only 85,000 active trusts filing required paperwork, most under $500,000 in value.  That’s not many trusts created since 1969, the first year that charitable remainder trusts were recognized.  With so few CRT’s in existence, it is difficult to obtain experience.  Nonetheless, after attending a short course, too many advisors profess expertise.  In reality, their new love of CRT’s has more to do with selling life insurance, annuities, or reinvesting assets in the market.  Whenever product is pushing process, the client is the one harmed. And, any advisor who does not put the client’s needs ahead of commissions, billable hours, or fees, should make sure his or her malpractice coverage is paid up.

 

Categories
Planning Articles and Links

IRD and IDIT Planning in the Estate – Henry & Associates

Making a Plan to Deal with EGTRRA

 

imageJohn and Dee Owens, both 65, have a family business that they expect to pass down to their son, John Jr., but they have other children to whom they plan to leave their stock portfolio and retirement accounts.  Through a series of corporate transactions, John Jr. will receive the stock owned by his father at no gift or estate cost and in return, his parents will have income through a deferred compensation and salary continuation agreement.  With their lifestyle and retirement security addressed, John and Dee turned their attention to their remaining assets to see how they could best pass them to their other three children who aren’t involved in the family businesses.  In 2002, the Owens’ jointly held stock portfolio had a value of $5 million and John’s IRA was worth $1.5 million.  They’ve decided to take only the minimum distributions, as required by law, to stretch out their retirement account.  This lets them leave the stock portfolio untapped to let it continue to appreciate as it has for the last 16 years.

 

When the Owens sat down to discuss their planning needs with their tax, legal and planning advisors, they were stunned to see how the estate tax “relief” they believed would protect their estate really affected their planning.  With Congress constantly tinkering with the estate tax by trying to raise the exempt amount, abolish the tax, or reintroduce the tax it has become increasingly difficult to plan when the goalposts keep moving.  After EGTRRA 2001, everyone agreed to plan for what they knew today, keep their planning flexible and their options open.  The result was an integration of several tactics and strategies designed to achieve a zero estate tax plan.  With only two principal assets left to plan for, and a desire to control their social capital, the Owens proceeded as follows.

 

Their Stock Portfolio

Given the uncertainty about the long-term nature of tax reform and estate tax relief, John and Dee decided to act now, rather than hope for an unlikely repeal of the death tax.  When the Owens saw how quickly their equity values would grow away from their ability to exempt those assets from tax, they created a family limited partnership to hold their stocks and some other investment assets.  After the partnership started, the Owens made lifetime exemption gifts of limited partnership assets to the kids, and then agreed to sell the remaining partnership units to an “intentionally defective irrevocable dynasty trust” (IDIT) for the benefit of their three kids and grandchildren.  By doing this installment sale, the Owens freeze the value, eliminate another appreciating asset from their estate and transfer the growth to their heirs.  This leaves only the need to deal with the “income in respect of a decedent” (IRD) assets found in their IRA and note to clean up the loose ends.  When their planning is finished, there should be no estate tax on their assets at death

 

Their IRA

By the time John and Dee factored in the required distributions commencing at age 70 and viewed how their remaining estate would appreciate to, and beyond, life expectancy, they concluded that the IRS was likely to harvest significant taxes from their estate.  Even in 2010, when the federal estate tax disappears for one year, there was still an income tax liability projected with their IRA.

 

imageIRA planning has been in the news lately because of relaxed new distribution rules and, some say, easier choices about beneficiary designations.  As a result, the common advice for many is to make use of a “stretch IRA” as a way to delay recognition of the deferred income for as long as possible.  That may make sense for many families, but they must understand some quirky issues if the stretch option is used.  Firstly, only a surviving spouse has the ability to “roll over” and start an IRA with new beneficiaries under his/her own life expectancy.  Secondly, while the stretched IRA may protect heirs from immediate income tax liabilities, it is not sheltered from estate tax.  This double dip by the tax collector may ultimately reduce the value of the inherited IRA by 70%.  Thirdly, after going through all of the gyrations needed to stretch an IRA and protect it from tax, many younger beneficiaries disrupt the planning by simply cashing in the IRA and paying the tax.  In their mind, it was free money and there wasn’t any reason to wait to enjoy their inheritance.  Fourthly, an IRA only produces ordinary income, taxed at higher rates than capital gains due from stock sales and lastly, the IRA can’t “step up” in basis like the inherited stock portfolio.

 

After the Owens reach age 70, their qualified retirement account typically won’t appreciate as quickly as the stock portfolio.  Why?  Even though invested just like their equity account, the required distributions nibble away at the IRA’s growth.  However, even with an account slowly eroded by mandatory payments, the IRA has the potential to be a significant asset and clients should know their options that include:

1.   Preserve the IRA via minimum distributions for as long as possible and split it into multiple accounts.  Then name each beneficiary to receive the proceeds over their life expectancies.  Seek competent counsel in this area, as the rules change based on the IRA owner’s payout status.

2.   Spend the IRA (qualified retirement plan asset) and don’t pass anything to heirs.  While this solves the estate and inherited income tax problem, there is a timing issue (running out of money before running out of time) involved unless the account is annuitized.

3.   Take withdrawals from the IRA and buy life insurance to replace the value of assets transferred to charity.  Whether this option is economical depends on the client’s age, health, tax status, and timing of death.  Success also depends on the insurance ownership being outside the estate to avoid unnecessary taxes on the proceeds.

4.   Take taxable withdrawals from the IRA and set up a concurrent charitable remainder trust with the appreciated equity portfolio.  Use the tax deduction to offset the IRA tax liabilities and the extra cash flow to buy life insurance inside an irrevocable trust.  Insurance proceeds structured in this fashion are generally income and estate tax free, and more net wealth may accrue to the heirs without concerns about a loss of step up in basis.

5.   Name a charitable remainder trust (probably a CRUT rather than a CRAT) as the IRA beneficiary for the surviving spouse, or name children as income beneficiaries if all of the estate planning tax considerations have been addressed.  Besides minimizing the immediate recognition of ordinary income, it provides a structured way to ensure the heirs won’t fritter away the proceeds.  Additionally, it may eventually allow capital gains income distributions from the trust instead of being an ordinary income pump for life.

6.   Name a charity to be the IRA beneficiary in order to establish a gift annuity for a surviving spouse.  It’s also possible to name children as annuitants, but this has to be handled properly because of the nature of the contracts and the potential for gift or estate tax liabilities.

7.   Name a charity as the IRA beneficiary to pass to a nonprofit organization those assets subject to tax.  That lets heirs receive capital assets that will step up in basis at death.  This choice is especially useful for clients with a desire to support charity and do so tax efficiently.