Turning off the Ordinary Income Pump
Employer Stock in Selected 401(k) Plans
|
Employer 1 |
% |
Employer 1 |
% |
|
Procter & Gamble |
94.7 |
Williams |
75.0 |
|
Sherwin-Williams |
91.6 |
McDonald's |
74.3 |
|
Abbott Laboratories |
90.2 |
Home Depot |
72.0 |
|
Pfizer |
85.5 |
McKesson HBOC |
72.0 |
|
BB&T |
81.7 |
Marsh & McLennan |
72.0 |
|
Anheuser-Busch |
81.6 |
Duke Energy |
71.3 |
|
Coca-Cola |
81.5 |
Textron |
70.0 |
|
General Electric |
77.4 |
Kroger |
65.3 |
|
|
75.7 |
Target |
64.0 |
|
William Wrigley, Jr. |
75.6 |
Household International |
63.7 |
|
1 Company stock as a percentage of total 401(k) plan assets |
|
11/01 DC Plan Investing, and Administration, NY. |
|
Despite the clamor
for pension reform resulting from the Enron debacle, many of the nation’s best companies
still have plenty of their own stock in their profit-sharing and 401(k)
retirement plans. While there are no
taxes when assets are sold and reinvested inside these plans, lifetime
withdrawals typically produce all ordinary income, taxed at the owner’s highest
marginal tax rate. In addition, such assets can be hit at death with both the
income tax and the estate tax, consuming up to 80% of their value as IRD assets
(income in respect of a decedent). These
IRD assets are more frequently found and many people don’t recognize the tax
traps associated with a lifetime of tax deferred savings.
Many people nearing
retirement or after leaving an employer irrevocably roll these assets into an
IRA, wait until the mandatory withdrawal age (April 1 after the year the owner
turns 70 ˝), and then begin withdrawals under the required minimum distribution
rules. From an IRA, withdrawals are 100% taxable ordinary income. There
is another, more tax-efficient way.
What Works?
Under retirement plan
distribution rules (3), if you meet certain requirements, you can
convert the appreciation from ordinary income to long-term capital gain by
taking an “in-kind distribution” of the employer securities inside your 40l(k)
or profit-sharing plan. There is no capital gain tax
until you sell, but you report as ordinary income only the cost basis of the
stock. This forces most people to sell stock to raise cash in order to pay the
tax, but this sale would also trigger the 20% capital gain tax on the appreciation.
What to do?
You can structure a
win-win situation for you and for your favorite charity. The ordinary income
tax to which you are subject when you receive an in-kind distribution can be
offset by the charitable deduction generated by funding a CRT.
Example: $2.5
million market value with $300,000 cost basis. Income tax is due on $300,000
cost basis. Owner sells the stock triggering 20% capital gain tax on the
appreciation. Total income tax and capital gain tax is $555,800.
Solution: Part Sale/Part Gift. Sell $500,000 worth of shares. Contribute $2
million worth of shares to a CRT.
CRT Portion: Charitable income tax
deduction on remainder value of CRT. No immediate capital gain tax when CRT
sells the shares. Lifetime income to owner/spouse; preferential tax treatment
under the 4-tier system. On death, CRT assets go to
donor’s charity. (For age M65/F65, 5%
CRT, 5.4% discount rate, deduction is $705,540 to be claimed up to IRS
contribution ceilings)
Who is Eligible?
Employee must have
been a participant for five years, and attained age 59 1/2; or have terminated
service with the employer; or be significantly disabled (2).
Summary
of Advantages of an In-kind (3) Distribution via CRT Planning
(1) DC
Plan Investing,
(2) IRC Sec. 72(m)(7)
(3) IRC 402(e)(4)(D)
© 2002, Henry &
Associates – Ashton Associates
![]()


Vaughn W. Henry
Henry &
Associates
Gift and Estate Planning
Services
22 Hyde Park Place
Springfield, IL 62703 USA
Phone: (217) 529-1958 Fax: (217)529-1959
Toll-free: (800) 879-2098
E-mail: VWHenry@aol.com
Last Updated: November 11, 2002
Gift & Estate Planning Services © 2002
CONTACT
US FOR A FREE
PRELIMINARY CASE STUDY FOR YOUR OWN CRT SCENARIO or try your own at Donor Direct. Please note -- there's much more to estate and charitable
planning than simply running software calculations, but it does give you a
chance to see how the calculations affect some of the design considerations.
This is not "do it yourself brain surgery". When is a CRUT superior
to a CRAT? Which type of CRT is best used with which assets? Although it may be
counter-intuitive, sometimes a lower payout CRUT makes more sense and pays more
total income to beneficiaries. Why? When to use a CLUT vs. CLAT and the traps
in each lead trust. Which tools work best in which planning scenarios? Check
with our office for solutions to this alphabet soup of planned giving tools.
